Mining Images – Kjell-Ake Andersson and the South Wales Miners

In 1979 at a time of great social and political change I was living in Durham.  I was closely   involved with the coal miners and the NUM, and also with a group called “Strong Words” that we had set up to record and publish the words and images of working-class people in the North East of England.

We organised many public events and exhibitions of words and photographs and we had many visitors. One of them, Rai Paul, was from Sweden and gave me a book that he thought fitted well with the work we were doing. It was called Gruvarbetare I Wales (Miners in Wales) and was a collection of photographs by Kjell-Ake Andersson of miners at the Bargoed colliery in South Wales. I was stunned by it: by the images of the miners and their families, by the ever-present coal mine and the dust and the blackness. It has stayed with me ever since, and my recent book (with Ray Hudson) The Shadow of the Mine begins with an image of Bargoed colliery taken from that book.  

Andersson had visited South Wales in 1973. At that time, he was a student at the photography school in Stockholm and was on an expedition following in the steps of Eugene Smith, the American photographer   who had seen in the mining villages of south Wales  classic images of labour under industrial capitalism. Here too they had seen the strength of community life that had come to underpin trade unionism and social democratic politics in Britain. Smith was in fact one of Kjell-Ake’s role models and, as he explains:

In 1950 he was in Wales photographing mining communities. I fantasized about going there because I thought it looked like when Smith was there in the 50s. This was in the autumn of 1973. Me and my wife and our 7-month-old baby took our old car and took the ferry to Britain.

As others had found in the fifties,  there were few places for visitors to stay  in the mining villages. In Bargoed, the little group had thought that they might stay in the local pub. However, the miners felt that this would be inappropriate and inhospitable, with one offering them a room in his house instead.  Which is where they stayed and became widely accepted by the miners and their families.

But it was hard work. It began with the miners’ morning shift when Kjell-Ake would stand with his camera day after day taking photographs until he became part of the landscape, blended in, and accepted as a new part of village life. Over time the people of Bargoed become involved in the project. It was the miners who insisted that Kjell-Ake had to join them with his camera underground, saying that the project would be incomplete without photographs of where the work actually took place. The opposition of colliery management had to be overcome! This took time and much coming and going between Bargoed and Stockholm, but in 1976 he finally got permission from the NCB to photograph the miners underground.  It was this level of community engagement that made the book one of the most perceptive visual accounts of mining life during a  critical period.

In 1973, the people in Bargoed remembered that, in the previous year, they had been involved in a victorious national strike. Following a decade of colliery closures and changes that had eroded miners’ wages they demanded recompense and a Court of Inquiry under Lord Wilberforce had supported their case reporting that:

Working conditions in the coal mines are certainly amongst the toughest and least attractive and we agree that miners’ pay levels should recognise this. Other occupations have their dangers and inconveniences, but we know of none in which there is such a combination of danger, health hazard, discomfort in working conditions, social inconvenience and community isolation.

These conditions endured after the strike had ended. They are captured in Andersson’s photographs taken on the surface of the mine, in the lamp room and the bath house, and also underground in the roadways and at the coal face. Here, at a time when the National Coal Board had still not issued overalls to its workers, we witness the ingrained dust and dirt of the mine on the clothing, faces and bodies of the miners.

We see the activity of the mine, the bending, crawling, shovelling, and carrying. Through careful portraiture we get a glimpse of the character and camaraderie of working together underground, of being together in the cage and, thankfully, ending the shift. On the surface too the photographs taken in family homes and in the clubs have a natural feel. Together they create an atmosphere of community, located within a stark and physically isolated environment. The trade union is present too with lodge meetings led by the lodge secretary Elwyn Andrews and the lodge banners that came together during the national strike in 1974: a short strike that provoked a general election and the end of the Heath government.  Momentous times. 

In 1985, Kjell-Ake returned to South Wales, this time as a film director to record the miners   who were involved in the longest  strike in the history of British coal  mining, attempting to stop the closure of the mines. As he explains,

I went there because I was so angry and irritated by the reporting of the strike in newspapers and on TV. No one described Thatcher’s attacks on the trade unions and the working class. I wanted to show the reason why the workers went on strike.

In 1977, Bargoed had joined the long list of closed collieries, so a new site was needed.  In the Eastern valleys Oakdale colliery remained one of the area’s “big hitters” and  was considered more secure than most. The men there had a reputation for moderation, but in 1984, they voted for strike action.  It was here that Andersson set up camp in February to make his  impressive realist documentary “Breaking Point”.

Once again his engagement with the local community is clear, giving  the  camera  a discrete  unseen presence as it joins with the people on picket lines, in canteens and mass meetings, drinking in the club and watching TV. His approach as ever involved “showing respect and being curious without disturbing anyone. A fly on the wall”.  Here again he became more and more “impressed by the cohesion and strength among the miners and their wives and other women despite the strike going on for almost a year”.

With winter set in, the snow falling, and as some men start to return to the pit, we see the resilience of those who remain on strike and also the tensions that emerge within a once united community. Tensions that create problems  for the local NUM lodge, and impel its chairman, Dan Canniff, to  use the  phrase that becomes the title of the film. With one eye on the future, when the strike will end, he urges caution over the condemnation of those have returned to work, after being on strike for eleven months. People, he says, have different circumstances, they are not all the same and all have different “breaking points”. 

Here, and throughout the coalfield, the support of the women for the strike (in a variety of different ways) was critical and we see this through the lives of Cath Francis and her husband Ray. They talk about juggling domestic arrangements to accommodate Ray’s picketing and Cath’s involvement in the support group which is clearly pivotal but which nevertheless  leaves her with pangs of conscience and embarrassment over domestic roles unfulfilled. The women took responsibility for preparing meals and played an important part in the door-to-door neighbourhood collections for food and other donations to the miners’ cause. We see this on the doorstep and also at the meeting of the women where some of the men “the lazy buggers” are criticised for refusing to help. It’s pointed out to applause that “the tins don’t grow in them carrier bags”. In response the chair, drawing implicitly on “heroic” and masculine images of miners, explains that while men might go picketing “when it comes to food collection and standing on street conners with the tin open asking for money…. some men have dignity”. 

Everywhere there  are glimpses of cracks appearing alongside strenuous efforts to hold things together. Alan Baker the lodge secretary was well known across the coalfield as an erudite and leading proponent of a broad front approach to the struggle, going beyond the mass strike to build more general support from the public though communication and alliances.  We see him in conversation over strategy with Dan Canniff and at a meeting with the convenor of the local Switchgear factory to receive the regular weekly donation that has been made by the workers there throughout the strike. Most telling is the scene where he is filmed watching Arthur Scargill on television, where the NUM President uses the opportunity to speak directly to his members who are still on strike. Visibly frustrated Baker, speaking to his wife, who is off camera, he calls for a different approach one that directly involves talking to and engaging the public. We see him for the last time standing with a pint of beer, alone and disconsolate, in the club.

The strike continued as did the arguments with management. Everywhere in mining strikes (and in others too) there have been disputes over the amount of necessary work needed in order to preserve the facility of the mine. Water needed to be pumped out and where faces had been standing for many months questions emerged over strata control and the security of the machinery. This became an issue at Oakdale and the lodge officials needed to be convinced that it was not a con but a real threat to the future of the mine. A threat to their future. The tension over sustaining the strike and securing the mine was clear. The dilemma that eventually resolved through an agreed and partial return to work. Here the film ends and with it a sense that the strike itself had run its course and would soon end.

The film Breaking Point and a collection of the Bargoed photographs will be shown in Cardiff at a conference on 2 March 2024 – The past in the present: Reflections on coal mining and the miners’ strike 1984-85.

Global Outpost

Cover for Global Outpost - discussion document

Going through my files and boxes of papers from the early 80s, I came across a document called “Global Outpost; The Working Class Experience of Big Business in the NE of England 1964-1978”. I wrote it with Terry Austrin in 1980 and it was based on interviews and discussions with workers and shop stewards in various branch plants of multi-national corporations operating on the old Durham coalfield. It was part of a broader research project looking at the transformations in working class life that had accompanied the closures of the coal mines in the 1960s. We had produced it as a Discussion Document, which was deliberately descriptive, using several accounts of changes in work and labour relations as an introduction to conversations about possible future strategy and tactics. We involved the regional office of the General and Municipal Workers Union, and they took 100 copies, devoted the front page of their newspaper to it and helped us set up further meetings with other shop stewards and union officials The shop stewards committee at Vickers Elswick plant took another 50 copies and there were scores of requests from other committees, local libraries and individuals, mainly in the North East but also nationally. I have written about this in “Engaging Labour” and how the paper took on a Samizdat quality being passed around and talked about.

So, what happened to it? Well through the other meetings and interviews we collected more information on how different corporations operated, each raising questions about the prospects and limitations of trade union organisation across a region with an economy dominated by branch plants – a global outpost. This would have allowed us to extend the document and the series editor at Fontana was very keen for it to be commissioned as a book and for it to be brought out quickly. Fontana had published “Strike at Pilkington’s” and Richard Hyman ‘s book “Strike” along with other well-known collections on work and labour, so, we were pleased. However for reasons I can’t recall, the company  took a distinct change of direction, moving away from any interest in the book and the deal fell through, leaving us disappointed.

At that time, I was in close contact with Henry Friedman, the ex-convenor at Ford’s River Plant at Dagenham who had been centrally involved in the sewing machinist strike there. Wheelchair bound, Henry was, and saw himself as, a labour strategist, and when I visited him in Bures in Suffolk, we talked about prospects for developing trade union combine committees. I had sent him a copy of “Global Outpost” and while he felt that in letting activists tell their own story we had produced an extremely valuable document, he wrote that there was a danger that “an unremitting recital of misfortune” could engender a “mood of gloom and defeatism”. In his view what was needed at that time was “a fighting spirit and recognition that at some point it is necessary to take a stand regardless – “their Waterloo or ours’”.

At that time, it seemed that only the miners could make such a stand and in 1981 they were on strike. From then on, they became the centre of our attention pushing “Global Outpost” into the background. Now, as an historical document, it may be worth a read. Terry and I went on to publish “Masters and Servants”, based on another discussion document and the first of two books we had planned on the miners of Durham. We were working on the second until five years ago when, tragically Terry’s died.

So there is the story of Global Outpost as I remember it. I do hope you enjoy reading the scan:

WISERD conversation – The Shadow of the Mine

In September I was asked by my friend Ian Rhys Jones at the research Institute WISERD to give a talk at their awayday about the bookThe Shadow of the Mine that I had written with Ray Hudson. The awayday became a virtual one, as a consequence of the virus, and we decided that rather than me speak for 40 minutes it would be more interesting to have a conversation about the book with my old friend Gareth Rees. This was recorded, and  as with the interview for Jacobin it extends some of the issues that we discussed in the book. Some people have found this interesting, the video is below and here’s the link to the event on the WISERD site

Breaking Point

Film – Miners Strike 1985

When the renowned Swedish film director Kjell-Ake Andersson was a young man, he visited South Wales in 1973 on a photographic expedition. Travelling on a shoe string, with his girlfriend and eight month old daughter Matilda he was taken in to a miner’s home in Bargoed. They stayed together in the village for three months, talking with the people and  taking photographs, returning twice in the following year. Widely accepted by the miners and their families, Anderson’s photographs portrayed their lives in intimate detail. His book, Gruvarbetare in Wales, was published in Sweden in 1977 and has become recognised as one of the most perceptive visual accounts of mining life in that period. One of the photographs is included inside The Shadows of the Mine and we are hoping to find a way of exhibiting his work in Wales in 2022.

Today Andersson often looks back to the time at Bargoed and recalls ‘meeting the mining community has made a great impact in my life. The generosity and solidarity and friendship I have never forgotten’.

He did return to the valleys in 1985 to make another important contribution. By this time established in film making, his documentary, Breaking Point, on the 1984-85 strike at Oakdale provided a telling account of the community in the snows of January. He has provided us with a version of this film: the narration is in Swedish, but the sounds of the valley town and the words of its people can be clearly heard, bringing back memories of the weeks before the strike ended. Take a look.

Breaking Point (1985). A film by Kjell-Ake Andersson

Our book is now published…

Well our new book The Shadow of the Mine: Coal and the End of Industrial Britain is now published and also reviewed here and there:

“A hymn to working-class community and to men and women’s souls” Will Hutton, author of The State We’re In

“Refreshing and necessary … [The Shadow of the Mine] explains in loving, careful detail why working people’s relationship with Labour in former industrial communities … had become complex and ultimately soured.” Laura Pidcock, Red Pepper

“Their brilliant analysis of the decline of British coal mining, and its social and political effects, is required reading for those who would speak for this working class. It is in many ways a study in the lost world of British labourism.” David Edgerton, The Times Literary Supplement

The Shadow of the Mine reminds us why this spirit [of solidarity and collectivism] has lived on in the coalfields, in spite of people feeling a sense of political betrayal going back decades … enlightening.” The Guardian

“Their new book is essential reading for anyone who wants to dig deeper beyond vague generalizations about the “red wall” that have proliferated since December 2019…Beynon and Hudson encourage us to explore the long-term trends that have shaped the bewildering political situation we find ourselves in now” Charlotte Austin, Jacobin

“The Shadow of the Mine, is a moving account of 150 years of coalfield history, focusing on South Wales and Durham. It is not, however, a detached study of the past. By tracing the “deep story” of the marginalisation of Britain’s coalfields, it aims to understand the continuing exclusion of working-class people in deindustrialised areas from political and social life…if the current Labour leader wants to understand the challenges facing him, he would be far better reading The Shadow of the Mine than listening to PR companies telling him to wrap the party in a union jack.” Diarmaid Kelliher, Antipode Online

About the book

The Shadow of the Mine: Coal and the End of Industrial Britain, London, Verso, 2021, 402pp. ISBN -13:978-1-83976-156-0

This historical study of the coal industry tells of King Coal in its heyday and how communities of mining families created a unique and powerful social and political presence in areas like South Wales and Durham. In 1984 miners here were involved in a yearlong strike to save jobs  and to save coal mining. After the defeat the industry went into precipitous decline and this book outlines the social and political consequences that followed: often told in the words of the people themselves.

Coalfield landscapes (from The Shadow of the Mine)

There is an insert of glossy black photographs in the middle of our new book, The Shadow of the Mine. They illustrate thew story of the book: the overwhelming presence of mining, the strike to save to industry and the community response, the closures, the changing landscapes of decline sitting alongside the promises of new industry and a better way of life. The selection ends with the response from within – collective ownership of the mine at Tower and the continuation of the annual Big Meeting in Durham. We have brought them together here along with a couple of additions of our own:

Coalfield landscapes

Thanks to Kjell-Åke Andersson, Paul Reas and Keith Pattison

BBC Radio 4 Thinking Allowed – Coalmining & Luddism: What do we mean by progress?

A couple of weeks ago I was invited to talk with Laurie Taylor on his programme “Thinking Allowed” about our new book:  “The Shadow of the Mine: Coal and the End of Industrial Britain”.  Subsequently I  had lots of messages from old  friends pleased to know  that I was still alive and kicking! The interview concentrated on a time in this country when there were miners, and focused on the long story of  the mining districts of south Wales and Durham. It was this time that my old friends were pleased to be reminded of. If you are interested too it is available on the BBC website.

‘My Dog’s Got what I’ve Got!’

Dogs and Humans

Some years ago I was helping with a study of older people and the ways in which they kept in touch with friends and family. As part of the survey we showed them a circle and asked them to place themselves in the centre and locate their friendships around them – the closest nearer to the centre (and them) and others further away. We were often asked whether pets could be included and they were invariably placed near the centre of the circle revealing an important truth about human-animal friendship. Many people find their closest emotional bonds to lie with animals as well as humans; animals as several people asserted, have become “part of the family”.

jack1In sociology human-animal interaction has previously been of little interest and has rarely been studied. When it has been given attention this has most often involved considering animals as entirely separate species and “objects” in relation to human beings. However findings like these, studies by biologists of living animals in their natural settings, and documentary programmes such as those by David Attenborough have revealed many of the similarities between humans and animals. Animals are now viewed as sentient and imaginative beings in their own right. All this has become clear in my personal life. At home we have five cats, two horses and two rescue ponies. We also have a dog: a springer spaniel called Jack. They are all very much “part of the family”, but this is a story about Jack and me.

Jack the Dog

Jack is a springer spaniel and we took him on when he was three months old. He had been living with a family with four young children in a semi-detached house in Cardiff. Without exercise he was proving difficult to handle! At that time our previous dog (a spaniel) had died and as we were planning to move from our house in a village to a smallholding we thought that it would be an ideal time to have a new puppy.

We knew about spaniels and that springers were especially energetic but nothing could have prepared us for Jack. He was ‘perpetual motion’: forever running flat out, jumping over walls, always with something in his mouth, often a plant pot covering his eyes.

jack2I got used to finding my slippers in the compost heap. The builders who visited found their gloves and caps disappearing, as well as their paint brushes and hammers. When anything was lost the shout would go up for “Jack!” Soon this little dog had come to dominate all our conversations, usually accompanied by laughter. People became convinced that he had a sense of humour. He would take a glove, run away with it and drop it when asked, only to run back to take the other one of the pair where you had left it! One of our friends was asked by his work mates why he kept smiling and he replied: “I’m just thinking about that bloody dog”. For us, he had become the centre of the house, with an excited greeting every morning, looking forward to the day, following us wherever we went; brilliant and happy with the cats and the sheep and with people. Oddly enough the dog had made it easier for us to interact with people who visited us here on the farm.

However we began to notice a change. When he was about three he was coming into the house in the afternoon and sleeping in his bed. He wasn’t quite as eager in the mornings and we thought that this was the sign of him “slowing down” as he matured. People had predicted that this would happen and that he couldn’t carry on at the pace he was setting. While he was still running around, it was not with such manic intent, and on one occasion he had taken a rest in the field on the way home. I suppose that this should have alerted us to a problem. However it soon become very clear that something was badly wrong. One morning we woke to find that Jack had been sick in the night and couldn’t get out of his bed!

Addison’s Disease

jack3Our vet, Bernice Fitzmaurice, was worried. She looked in Jack’s mouth, and his cold white gums indicated that he was in shock. He was put on a drip and kept in over the weekend for tests. She thought that he might have Addison’s Disease, a rare condition in dogs but not impossible given his symptoms.

We thought this was most unlikely, even impossible, because I had been diagnosed with Addison’s Disease ten years earlier. The disease is even more rare in human beings than dogs and the chances that both of us would have it were exceptionally limited. However, and in spite of all our doubts, the tests confirmed that Jack did indeed have Addison’s – our dog had the same illness as me!

The current estimates of the national incidence in dogs vary from 0.036% to 0.5%. It was common to calculate its prevalence in humans at 35–60 per million and although recent studies suggest a figure nearer 117 per million ( 0.0117%) it is still very rare. So for both of us to have ended up with this unusual and uncommon illness was quite a surprise. Although Riverside Vets in Abergavenny have 7 other dogs (of different breeds) with Addison’s , none of them have owners with the same condition, nor have they ever come across a similar case.

Addison’s Disease is an idiopathic adrenal insufficiency, most commonly brought about by the progressive destruction of the adrenal gland by the immune system. As such the symptoms become more acute over time, explaining Jack’s progressive deterioration. It is the same disease in humans and dogs but there are some differences that relate to our differing metabolisms. The human adrenal gland has three zones producing glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids and a male hormone. Dogs have just the first two zones but not the third, and they produce much less glucocorticoid than humans. As such the treatment – which is to provide replacement medication (‘steroids’) – is slightly different.

Diagnosis

I remembered how it came about that I was diagnosed. I had been very weary for many months. Sometimes in the evening after work I would find even talking to be too much effort. My wife, Helen, thought that I exhibited many of the symptoms of depression yet paradoxically without seeming miserable. I became more and more tired, occasionally exhausted and then unsteady on my feet. After a fall, a registrar at Neville Hall noticed pigmentation of my skin which is a tell-tale sign of Addison’s (which is notoriously difficult to diagnose) in humans. His suspicions were further aroused by a blood test showing high levels of potassium and low levels of sodium. One of the other features of the condition in people is a “postural drop” in blood pressure that occurs when standing up and produces unsteadiness. This of course can be checked but I wondered how vets were able to come to a diagnosis, given that the symptoms are so unspecific and, of course, dogs can’t talk.

jack4Bernice explained that they see Addison’s as “the great pretender”. It mimics many other conditions and in their training vets are alerted to “things that don’t respond as they should to treatment”. They look out for any unsteadiness or hind limb weaknesses and are especially alerted by intestinal problems, or vomiting and dehydration and, as with humans, they would initially check on the electrolytes and see any warning signs of low sodium and high potassium. This is what they did with Jack and, as with humans, followed it with the Synacthen test which confirmed that his adrenal gland wasn’t working. 

Tablet Routines and Recovery

Given our differences, our medication is slightly different: I need to take a lot of hydrocortisone while Jack has to take much more fludrocortisone in a tablet called Florinef to replace his mineralocorticoids. We have to do this daily and this does mean that we have similar routines. We are the great tablet takers!

To ease this vital process, Jack’s tablets are wrapped in a piece of chicken. This has meant that he never forgets. When the dose is due he has been known to stand looking at the fridge door to remind me. This also reminds me to take mine!

The tablet regime brought things back into balance for Jack. He was soon back to normal: he hadn’t really slowed up at all!

Crises

jack5However things can go off the rails for him and for me. Jack had broken his leg when he was still a young dog and he had endured the surgery and the recovery period with great fortitude. However when he needed a further operation to remove the metal work in his leg, the fact that he had Addison’s Disease was a cause of concern requiring the surgeon to provide steroids during the operation and us to (temporarily) add hydrocortisone to his tablet regime when we got him home.

Infections and stress can also make things go out of balance which, if not corrected can turn into a crisis.   Both Jack and I have had crises and they aren’t very pleasant. I can end up in A&E. The last time I was there the Senior House Officer was amazed to hear about Jack and he insisted that I should write about the fact that ‘my dog’s got what I’ve got’. That’s just one of the many ways in which Jack has entered the fabric of our lives and been good for us.

jack6We have also been good for him. If you don’t have Addison’s Disease it’s hard to understand what it is and how it operates. We’ve learned that it’s important to spot the signs in me and this helps us with Jack. It means that we have been able (so far) to intervene when things are out of kilter for him and to prevent an acute crisis.

So we help each other. Given how rare the disease is in humans the chances of Jack finding us was a bit like a needle in a haystack; perhaps two and a half million to one. For his sake and ours, we’re glad that he did.

Huw Beynon

Many thanks to Helen Sampson for her help with the writing of this piece and to our vet Bernice Fitzmaurice for her advice and encouragement.

The Rise of the Corporate University in the UK

I have written a piece on what’s happening in HE at the moment, and how Universities are changing. The article is available to read on the Global Dialogue website.